letter wallpaper
images 4 Cool Letter Wallpapers by
dvb
10-25 03:21 PM
You can get such issues - errors on I-94 made by (CBP) customs and border partol during entry - fixed by contacting the CPB officer at your local international airport and explaining the situation.
I just got my I-94 corrected for a similar mistake (passport exipry date vs. visa expiry date).
See this thread : http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?p=188698#post188698
I there i have a similar situation and would like some advise.
Last time i entered the USA was in JAN 07, and when i entered i got a new I-94 with expiration day of JULY 07 because my passport expires on JULY 07 (Entered usinga valid H1-b visa stamped on passport).
I did renew my passport for the 3rd and last time once in usa, since i can't get a brand new one unless get it in my country of citizenship.
I just found out that my I-94 is expired (4 Months later), now I am trying to switch employers and that's how i found out about my I-94.
Looks like the lawyer might file the H-1b transfer with "consular notification" that way once the H1-b gets approved i would need to leave the country to go to my home country and get a brand new passport and go to the USA consulate and get a new H1b stamp in my passport.
what question is: is this what i am supposed to do? should i live the USA before 180 days after i-94 expiration? what if i dont' have my new 797 from my new employer, can I leave the country? what if for some reason i don't i get my new h1b refused for some reason?
any advise on this?
I just got my I-94 corrected for a similar mistake (passport exipry date vs. visa expiry date).
See this thread : http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?p=188698#post188698
I there i have a similar situation and would like some advise.
Last time i entered the USA was in JAN 07, and when i entered i got a new I-94 with expiration day of JULY 07 because my passport expires on JULY 07 (Entered usinga valid H1-b visa stamped on passport).
I did renew my passport for the 3rd and last time once in usa, since i can't get a brand new one unless get it in my country of citizenship.
I just found out that my I-94 is expired (4 Months later), now I am trying to switch employers and that's how i found out about my I-94.
Looks like the lawyer might file the H-1b transfer with "consular notification" that way once the H1-b gets approved i would need to leave the country to go to my home country and get a brand new passport and go to the USA consulate and get a new H1b stamp in my passport.
what question is: is this what i am supposed to do? should i live the USA before 180 days after i-94 expiration? what if i dont' have my new 797 from my new employer, can I leave the country? what if for some reason i don't i get my new h1b refused for some reason?
any advise on this?
wallpaper Green Letter Wallpaper
stucklabor
02-25 12:29 PM
Alpha_centauri, start helping yourself.
The admins here have access only to the same bills/markups/text that you do.
If a bill says 'applicants with advanced degrees are exempt from the quota', I would take it at face value and conclude that an Eb-3 with an advanced degree would be exempt from the quota.
Ditto searching through Specter's bill for the provision which is Section 313 of PACE.
It is not fair to ask overloaded volunteers to look through a publicly available bill for a provision, something that you can do yourself. If Specter's bill mentions that paragraph (a)(5) of 8 USC 1152 is to be deleted, do a Google search for 8 USC 1152 and look up the paragraph which is to be deleted.
From your other post in another thread, it appears that you are a PhD. If you expect a regular engineer to wade through one of your papers and understand, maybe it is not unfair for me to ask you to do the same thing ;-) re a bill/markup.
My 2c.
Admin,
Thanks for summarizing Specter's proposed bill. Can you clarify the following:
******************
:) Remove applicants with certain Advanced degrees from the EB quota Those with advanced degrees in Science, Technology, Engineering and Math are taken out of the quota. But note the applicant must have worked in a related field in the US for 3 years prior to their application. So if you started working in Jan 2001 and applied for GC in Dec 2003, you are still in the quota and not outside of it. Could take out 20-50% of EB-2 applicants from quota.
*****************
- Would this apply if your labor is filed as EB-3 even though you have an MS/PhD degree?
********************
:confused: Direct adjustment of status for those with certain PhDs
Those with PhDs in Mathematics, Engineering, Technology and Physical Sciences and are currently working can directly apply for Adjustment of Status. I am not able to find any rationale as to why they specifically mentioned Physical Sciences here. Every where else they have just mentioned "Sciences".
************************
- Where is this mentioned in Specter's bill? I know this is section 313 in the PACE act
- Would you need to file a I-140 also?
- Would this apply to people who have already received a Ph.D. from an accredited US university and currently empolyed or would it only apply to future PhDs (the current language of the PACE act seems to point towards the latter).
The admins here have access only to the same bills/markups/text that you do.
If a bill says 'applicants with advanced degrees are exempt from the quota', I would take it at face value and conclude that an Eb-3 with an advanced degree would be exempt from the quota.
Ditto searching through Specter's bill for the provision which is Section 313 of PACE.
It is not fair to ask overloaded volunteers to look through a publicly available bill for a provision, something that you can do yourself. If Specter's bill mentions that paragraph (a)(5) of 8 USC 1152 is to be deleted, do a Google search for 8 USC 1152 and look up the paragraph which is to be deleted.
From your other post in another thread, it appears that you are a PhD. If you expect a regular engineer to wade through one of your papers and understand, maybe it is not unfair for me to ask you to do the same thing ;-) re a bill/markup.
My 2c.
Admin,
Thanks for summarizing Specter's proposed bill. Can you clarify the following:
******************
:) Remove applicants with certain Advanced degrees from the EB quota Those with advanced degrees in Science, Technology, Engineering and Math are taken out of the quota. But note the applicant must have worked in a related field in the US for 3 years prior to their application. So if you started working in Jan 2001 and applied for GC in Dec 2003, you are still in the quota and not outside of it. Could take out 20-50% of EB-2 applicants from quota.
*****************
- Would this apply if your labor is filed as EB-3 even though you have an MS/PhD degree?
********************
:confused: Direct adjustment of status for those with certain PhDs
Those with PhDs in Mathematics, Engineering, Technology and Physical Sciences and are currently working can directly apply for Adjustment of Status. I am not able to find any rationale as to why they specifically mentioned Physical Sciences here. Every where else they have just mentioned "Sciences".
************************
- Where is this mentioned in Specter's bill? I know this is section 313 in the PACE act
- Would you need to file a I-140 also?
- Would this apply to people who have already received a Ph.D. from an accredited US university and currently empolyed or would it only apply to future PhDs (the current language of the PACE act seems to point towards the latter).
sunny1000
12-13 01:04 PM
I contacted Senator Cornyn via email from his website to thank him..I told him how appreciative the Skilled immigrant community is for his initiative. I emphasised on the the "SKIlLLED" part...
2011 old letter wallpaper - 120095
bijualex29
05-08 11:31 AM
This mail is for IV Moderator or Admin;
Can you work out something in this S.2197 to ammendment to incorporate our issue.
Can you work out something in this S.2197 to ammendment to incorporate our issue.
more...
arihant
04-13 11:31 AM
Here is the format I created from the AILA's response to send. Use it if you want to send to them as well. Sending through the AILA website is almost as easy as sending a webfax from this website:
My company applied for my Labor a few years ago, and I am currently awaiting certification by the BEC. Here are my comments on the referenced proposed rule. Specifically, I am concerned about the validity period of labor certifications as, if implemented, it has a potential to adversely impact me.
45-Day Validity Period
The Department's proposal to introduce a 45-day validity period for approved labor certification applications is completely unworkable.
Filing an I-140 form is not just a matter of quickly filling out a form. It takes considerable time to obtain accurate information and to acquire and prepare the necessary supporting documentation. Certain corporate documents to evidence employer viability, such as licenses, charters of incorporation, organizational charts, tax returns and other financial documents, must be filed with the I-140 form and thus must be gathered. Ability to pay the offered wage must be explained, evidence of the beneficiary's past experience must be gathered, and an evaluation of the employee's credentials often must be commissioned. These are just a few of the steps necessary to file an I-140 petition.
This preparation takes time and costs money. Given the costs associated with such preparation, it is not practical or reasonable to require our employer to incur these expenses and to devote time and resources to the preparation of an I-140 petition without first knowing whether the first hurdle in the case--labor certification--has been overcome.
Other factors also make the 45-day period unrealistic. The parties that need to sign the forms are not always readily available. For example, the human resources director might be away on a business trip or on leave. The beneficiary might be on vacation, or, not uncommonly, still residing abroad. The attorney could be away on vacation. Coordinating and obtaining signatures of these individuals takes time.
On top of the problems and issues that would prevent filing an immigrant petition within 45 days of labor certification, there is the delay caused by the DOL itself in getting the approved labor certification into our hands. From the time an application is designated as approved on the PERM online system, one to three weeks is the typical time frame before the lawyer/employer receive the certified ETA 9089 in the mail. And, it sometimes can take even longer if there are delays in the DOL mailing room (which are not uncommon). If, as the proposed rule is written, the 45-day period runs from the date of approval, in many cases, the labor certification will not have been even received before the 45 days are up.
The supplemental information section of the proposed rule indicates that one of the reasons for imposing a 45-day limit on validity is concern that a job opportunity may change or become stale. This concern is ironic given that it has been government processing delays rather than the deliberate delay of employers that have aged the applications. Hundreds of thousands of labor certification applications have been pending for years. And while the DOL has, for the most part, established a faster processing record under PERM, numerous cases still take well beyond the DOL stated goal of 45 to 60 days. Moreover, processing of the I-140 immigrant visa petition and adjustment of status application with USCIS easily takes 12 to 18 months, and processing an immigrant visa application with a consular post normally takes no less than six months. What can cause even greater delay is the long wait as a result of visa retrogression.
A 45-day limit on the validity of a labor certification would be an unreasonable and unjustified burden. I would suggest in the alternative that one year is more reasonable and practical. This would provide sufficient time to gather documentation, and would cover the delays resulting from the unexpected problems that can arise when processing paperwork in a company. And, this time frame is not without precedent. Under section 203(g) of the Immigration Act, registration of aliens for purposes of immigrant visa issuance expires after one year.
I thank you for the opportunity provided to express my concerns regarding the rule, and I hope you will take the comments expressed by me in due faith.
My company applied for my Labor a few years ago, and I am currently awaiting certification by the BEC. Here are my comments on the referenced proposed rule. Specifically, I am concerned about the validity period of labor certifications as, if implemented, it has a potential to adversely impact me.
45-Day Validity Period
The Department's proposal to introduce a 45-day validity period for approved labor certification applications is completely unworkable.
Filing an I-140 form is not just a matter of quickly filling out a form. It takes considerable time to obtain accurate information and to acquire and prepare the necessary supporting documentation. Certain corporate documents to evidence employer viability, such as licenses, charters of incorporation, organizational charts, tax returns and other financial documents, must be filed with the I-140 form and thus must be gathered. Ability to pay the offered wage must be explained, evidence of the beneficiary's past experience must be gathered, and an evaluation of the employee's credentials often must be commissioned. These are just a few of the steps necessary to file an I-140 petition.
This preparation takes time and costs money. Given the costs associated with such preparation, it is not practical or reasonable to require our employer to incur these expenses and to devote time and resources to the preparation of an I-140 petition without first knowing whether the first hurdle in the case--labor certification--has been overcome.
Other factors also make the 45-day period unrealistic. The parties that need to sign the forms are not always readily available. For example, the human resources director might be away on a business trip or on leave. The beneficiary might be on vacation, or, not uncommonly, still residing abroad. The attorney could be away on vacation. Coordinating and obtaining signatures of these individuals takes time.
On top of the problems and issues that would prevent filing an immigrant petition within 45 days of labor certification, there is the delay caused by the DOL itself in getting the approved labor certification into our hands. From the time an application is designated as approved on the PERM online system, one to three weeks is the typical time frame before the lawyer/employer receive the certified ETA 9089 in the mail. And, it sometimes can take even longer if there are delays in the DOL mailing room (which are not uncommon). If, as the proposed rule is written, the 45-day period runs from the date of approval, in many cases, the labor certification will not have been even received before the 45 days are up.
The supplemental information section of the proposed rule indicates that one of the reasons for imposing a 45-day limit on validity is concern that a job opportunity may change or become stale. This concern is ironic given that it has been government processing delays rather than the deliberate delay of employers that have aged the applications. Hundreds of thousands of labor certification applications have been pending for years. And while the DOL has, for the most part, established a faster processing record under PERM, numerous cases still take well beyond the DOL stated goal of 45 to 60 days. Moreover, processing of the I-140 immigrant visa petition and adjustment of status application with USCIS easily takes 12 to 18 months, and processing an immigrant visa application with a consular post normally takes no less than six months. What can cause even greater delay is the long wait as a result of visa retrogression.
A 45-day limit on the validity of a labor certification would be an unreasonable and unjustified burden. I would suggest in the alternative that one year is more reasonable and practical. This would provide sufficient time to gather documentation, and would cover the delays resulting from the unexpected problems that can arise when processing paperwork in a company. And, this time frame is not without precedent. Under section 203(g) of the Immigration Act, registration of aliens for purposes of immigrant visa issuance expires after one year.
I thank you for the opportunity provided to express my concerns regarding the rule, and I hope you will take the comments expressed by me in due faith.
chanduv23
04-20 10:42 AM
I was fired. I did not know because I was working from home that day. Suddenly I was not able to login to the email and when I called office they told me even the door access code changed and lateron I was given 2 weeks pay in lieu of notice and a 2 month severance by UPS courier. I was formally informed on phone that my services have been terminated with no cause but later sent me a notice that I have agreed to mutuallly move out of the company.
My manager singled me out a week before and we had an arguement, he challenged me he will get me fired and send me on a plane back to my country (India).
This happened when I entered my 6th year on h1b (May 2005), my EB3 LC stuck in BEC (PD 2004).
I was in tough situation because no one told me what to do next, and no one was hiring me as i did not have enough time on h1b. My wife was applying for residencies and this put us in lot of trouble.
On one side, I have to get a h1b transferred ASAP and I had to reconcialate on what to do and how to get out of mess. My company would give me h1b docs for transfer and I am stuck.
Then with a lot of difficulty I managed to get copies from lawyer (USABAL) without my company's knowledge, found myself a contract project and found a H1b sponser (Consulting) within 20 days of firing and moved on.
The consulting got my 7th year extension based on L/C pending in BEC and immediately applied for PERM EB2 and also got 140 approved and got a 3 year extension on h1b beyond 7th year. I am in consulting from then on and wife also got into residency , I am earnily 2 times I used to earn before, I change projects at a time I think I can get a better rate....
Basically, what I want to say is, "Don't give in to crap because of GC. Managers will exploit you" in my case, my manager acted that way because I exposed his wrongdoing. I was not fortunate because he had contacts, but then, the company is not great and I am now better off.
So do not digest crap, if you are good, sincere, honest and skilled, there will be a way out.
SAY NO TO CRAP.
Good luck
My manager singled me out a week before and we had an arguement, he challenged me he will get me fired and send me on a plane back to my country (India).
This happened when I entered my 6th year on h1b (May 2005), my EB3 LC stuck in BEC (PD 2004).
I was in tough situation because no one told me what to do next, and no one was hiring me as i did not have enough time on h1b. My wife was applying for residencies and this put us in lot of trouble.
On one side, I have to get a h1b transferred ASAP and I had to reconcialate on what to do and how to get out of mess. My company would give me h1b docs for transfer and I am stuck.
Then with a lot of difficulty I managed to get copies from lawyer (USABAL) without my company's knowledge, found myself a contract project and found a H1b sponser (Consulting) within 20 days of firing and moved on.
The consulting got my 7th year extension based on L/C pending in BEC and immediately applied for PERM EB2 and also got 140 approved and got a 3 year extension on h1b beyond 7th year. I am in consulting from then on and wife also got into residency , I am earnily 2 times I used to earn before, I change projects at a time I think I can get a better rate....
Basically, what I want to say is, "Don't give in to crap because of GC. Managers will exploit you" in my case, my manager acted that way because I exposed his wrongdoing. I was not fortunate because he had contacts, but then, the company is not great and I am now better off.
So do not digest crap, if you are good, sincere, honest and skilled, there will be a way out.
SAY NO TO CRAP.
Good luck
more...
BharatPremi
09-18 07:59 PM
Thanks to IV on this Anniversary.
With hopes to have same fighting spirit on for coming years.
Best Luck to us.
With hopes to have same fighting spirit on for coming years.
Best Luck to us.
2010 smoke wallpaper. Smoke Letters
sunny1000
06-20 04:43 PM
I agree with everyone on this thread...my personal opinion is that the bill should die. Then, someone should bury it deep and never let it come back again and haunt us like it is doing right now.:(
more...
gcisadawg
04-29 03:42 PM
Check this out b4 making any decision -
http://infotech.indiatimes.com/News/SAPs-Q1-misses-forecasts/articleshow/4463883.cms
Any software suite has a life span and end may be nearer for SAP. Oracle is constantly following them and slowly eating away their market share. Oracle's Fusion is widely anticipated. It may give SAP a run for its money. That is why it makes sense to become a business process expert with SAP knowledge rather than a SAP expert with a Business process knowledge.
http://infotech.indiatimes.com/News/SAPs-Q1-misses-forecasts/articleshow/4463883.cms
Any software suite has a life span and end may be nearer for SAP. Oracle is constantly following them and slowly eating away their market share. Oracle's Fusion is widely anticipated. It may give SAP a run for its money. That is why it makes sense to become a business process expert with SAP knowledge rather than a SAP expert with a Business process knowledge.
hair White Letter Mess Desktop
veerug
10-28 03:05 PM
It was really nice meeting all those folks. I found them to be very special group of people. They were all nice, down to earth and very smart people. Thanks to IV for bringing everyone together and thanks to Navin, Himanshu and other for organizing this meeting. Hope to see everyone again. I have no doubt that IV will grow very fast and will be a great success one day.
Varinder
Varinder
more...
looneytunezez
09-30 12:25 PM
Non-Compete contracts fall under the purview of contract law.
For eg: in CA, non-compete is not enforceable except under some conditions....
Most non-compete contracts in CA, even though signed, are void.
Every state defines what type of agreement is allowable and what is not?
I would recommend consult an employment lawyer in your state.
This is not to say that, the employer A for you, might not take you to court out of spite.
HTH,
LT
For eg: in CA, non-compete is not enforceable except under some conditions....
Most non-compete contracts in CA, even though signed, are void.
Every state defines what type of agreement is allowable and what is not?
I would recommend consult an employment lawyer in your state.
This is not to say that, the employer A for you, might not take you to court out of spite.
HTH,
LT
hot reading a letter wallpaper
InTheMoment
05-07 08:38 PM
chanduv23,
Pre-adjudication - as the term is used by USCIS - definitely means the file is reviewed by the AO (Adj. Officer) exactly as prescribed in their Standard Operating Procedure. All in all the only things done after pre-adjudication - when PD becomes current are - requesting a visa# from DoS, putting the approved stamp and signing and registering the PR status. That does not mean the officer may not again review the file based on updated data but the chances of that happening is low.
Those who have received RFE's and pre-adj. or know that they are pre-adj without RFE should be very happy knowing that their cases will be speedily approved once their PD is current.
How else do you think they issued thousands of GC's in June and July 2nd '07 -much higher than their usual levels of approving cases.
Preadjudication means - doing everything in background before an officer starts looking at your file. So lets not get confused about preprocessing.
Cases are being processed to an extent they can be processed. You may not get an approval now but denials, rfe, case transfers are alll possible. We are seeing a lot more because July 2007 applications are being processed and the numbers are high.
You may not have to rely on the case status online system as it is not very consistent. The Officers may chose not to update this system.
Pre-adjudication - as the term is used by USCIS - definitely means the file is reviewed by the AO (Adj. Officer) exactly as prescribed in their Standard Operating Procedure. All in all the only things done after pre-adjudication - when PD becomes current are - requesting a visa# from DoS, putting the approved stamp and signing and registering the PR status. That does not mean the officer may not again review the file based on updated data but the chances of that happening is low.
Those who have received RFE's and pre-adj. or know that they are pre-adj without RFE should be very happy knowing that their cases will be speedily approved once their PD is current.
How else do you think they issued thousands of GC's in June and July 2nd '07 -much higher than their usual levels of approving cases.
Preadjudication means - doing everything in background before an officer starts looking at your file. So lets not get confused about preprocessing.
Cases are being processed to an extent they can be processed. You may not get an approval now but denials, rfe, case transfers are alll possible. We are seeing a lot more because July 2007 applications are being processed and the numbers are high.
You may not have to rely on the case status online system as it is not very consistent. The Officers may chose not to update this system.
more...
house Letter Paper : The World of
walking_dude
01-28 07:11 PM
This is old news! IV had already posted an update on this issue some days back
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=16834
It's also not a new bill created by 'combined efforts' of any groups. It was presented to Transport commitee much before AG came up with his new interpretation. SOS Ms. Terri Lynn Land also mentioned this bill along with her rule denying DLs to legal no-permanent residents.
Don't get fooled by their spin. IMO the whole drama of denying DLs to visa holders was enacted to pass this bill. This bill if passed in the current state will give only Temporary Driving Licenses valid only upto the date on your I-94. It will require DL renewals along Visa/status renewal. It gives EAD holders (users) DL for only 1 year. So it doesn't exactly fit the definition of 'Good News' as we'll be losing 4 year DL extensions we had before.
Here's the relevant section of the bill
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showpost.php?p=217840&postcount=28
Update Regarding Michigan Driver’s License
Dear International Students,
We want to update you on the progress of last week’s ruling on Michigan Driver’s licenses for international students and scholars. WSU’s administration is working hard along with AILA, (American Immigration Lawyer’s Association), and other Michigan schools and businesses. As a result of this collective effort, an amended bill to allow foreign nationals to continue to apply for driver’s licenses will be discussed at a hearing in Lansing on January 31. It looks positive that this bill will be passed an implemented within 30 days. Below are some important points you should know:
� Currently, you are able to renew your driver’s license if you
have a social security number;
� Generally, you can drive on a driver’s license from your native country; (just make sure you carry your passport with you.)
We will keep our website home page updated with the latest information
www.oiss.wayne.edu
Please do not hesitate to contact us should you have additional questions or concerns.
Sincerely,
Linda Seatts, M.A.,
Director
Wayne State University
Office of International Students and Scholars
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=16834
It's also not a new bill created by 'combined efforts' of any groups. It was presented to Transport commitee much before AG came up with his new interpretation. SOS Ms. Terri Lynn Land also mentioned this bill along with her rule denying DLs to legal no-permanent residents.
Don't get fooled by their spin. IMO the whole drama of denying DLs to visa holders was enacted to pass this bill. This bill if passed in the current state will give only Temporary Driving Licenses valid only upto the date on your I-94. It will require DL renewals along Visa/status renewal. It gives EAD holders (users) DL for only 1 year. So it doesn't exactly fit the definition of 'Good News' as we'll be losing 4 year DL extensions we had before.
Here's the relevant section of the bill
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showpost.php?p=217840&postcount=28
Update Regarding Michigan Driver’s License
Dear International Students,
We want to update you on the progress of last week’s ruling on Michigan Driver’s licenses for international students and scholars. WSU’s administration is working hard along with AILA, (American Immigration Lawyer’s Association), and other Michigan schools and businesses. As a result of this collective effort, an amended bill to allow foreign nationals to continue to apply for driver’s licenses will be discussed at a hearing in Lansing on January 31. It looks positive that this bill will be passed an implemented within 30 days. Below are some important points you should know:
� Currently, you are able to renew your driver’s license if you
have a social security number;
� Generally, you can drive on a driver’s license from your native country; (just make sure you carry your passport with you.)
We will keep our website home page updated with the latest information
www.oiss.wayne.edu
Please do not hesitate to contact us should you have additional questions or concerns.
Sincerely,
Linda Seatts, M.A.,
Director
Wayne State University
Office of International Students and Scholars
tattoo letter to the wallpaper.
computerClerk
06-10 05:38 PM
Reader of this post,
Can someone experienced with the laws of this forum explain me what it means to have a 'negative reputation' and why my post is assigned with -25 reputation points and by whom.
I fail to understand, why my post is offensive to any one to take such a action.
Thanks
Gaurav
Can someone experienced with the laws of this forum explain me what it means to have a 'negative reputation' and why my post is assigned with -25 reputation points and by whom.
I fail to understand, why my post is offensive to any one to take such a action.
Thanks
Gaurav
more...
pictures letter wallpaper Image
walking_dude
12-12 12:05 PM
IMO, Everyone should do whatever he/she feels right without waiting for others. Others will automatically join in if they feel it's worth it.
If you are going to post, write a covering letter providing your full history send it in a big box with copy of all your documents (sensitive info blacked out) by 'Registered Post' or with Tracking number/Signature, so you know who got it. You can use it in future correspondences/reminders ( several needed to get any response - my experience)
Best of luck
If you are going to post, write a covering letter providing your full history send it in a big box with copy of all your documents (sensitive info blacked out) by 'Registered Post' or with Tracking number/Signature, so you know who got it. You can use it in future correspondences/reminders ( several needed to get any response - my experience)
Best of luck
dresses style letter r wallpaper.
jonty_11
08-06 12:49 PM
Some folks who sent their application in august also got approvals. This is all joke.
Yes..indeed it is.... until one day you get your approval email !!!!
Yes..indeed it is.... until one day you get your approval email !!!!
more...
makeup EMO Vector Art Love Letter
GKBest
10-06 01:41 PM
My attorney Rajiv Khanna's office sent me scanned copies to me.They asked me to let them know if I need originals so that they can mail them.I didn't ask for it this point.Do you guys suggest me to get them and keep it with me?
I'd suggest ask for the original so that you won't be held hostage by them. You just don't know what may happen beyond your control. And you may want to change lawyers in the future.
I'd suggest ask for the original so that you won't be held hostage by them. You just don't know what may happen beyond your control. And you may want to change lawyers in the future.
girlfriend Letter Wallpaper |Picture
gcretroiv
04-11 05:12 PM
Sorry to hear
1) You can definitely get transfer to other company , but u have to give whatever is required documents- recent paystubs/present legal status/approval copy
2) Nope, there is no grace period. You will be out of status, the moment you are fired. That is whay most of the people will apply for transfer, the momemt they smell some thign wrong with present job.
People say 10 days is fine. But as per strict law, there is no such thing.
1) You can definitely get transfer to other company , but u have to give whatever is required documents- recent paystubs/present legal status/approval copy
2) Nope, there is no grace period. You will be out of status, the moment you are fired. That is whay most of the people will apply for transfer, the momemt they smell some thign wrong with present job.
People say 10 days is fine. But as per strict law, there is no such thing.
hairstyles Of Last Letter Wallpaper
kvranand
03-23 08:29 PM
Hi nik.patelc
My case is also similar to yours.
RD 08/13/07 NSC EB2 (PD Apr '06)
ND 09/19/07 (USCIS shows, we have received your application on 09/19/07.......)
I do not see any LUD's after 11/29/07. Under normal circumstances these dates differ by only 3~4 days. But since they received high volume of applications at that time, I believe 09/19/07 will be our receipt date. We may have to wait couple of months to see any movement in our cases. I may be wrong.
Any comments???
My case is also similar to yours.
RD 08/13/07 NSC EB2 (PD Apr '06)
ND 09/19/07 (USCIS shows, we have received your application on 09/19/07.......)
I do not see any LUD's after 11/29/07. Under normal circumstances these dates differ by only 3~4 days. But since they received high volume of applications at that time, I believe 09/19/07 will be our receipt date. We may have to wait couple of months to see any movement in our cases. I may be wrong.
Any comments???
s_r_e_e
08-19 01:08 PM
changing air tickets cost $500 max ?
drirshad
11-16 09:36 PM
Guys whoever planning to use EAD going forward get ready for $700- per head out of pocket every year. That is the cost of renewal for EAD & AP without attorney involvement. Add additional family members and you can understand why was July bulletin made current.
Lots of revenue at our expense .......
Lots of revenue at our expense .......
0 comments:
Post a Comment