luigi wallpaper
images Bob Dob Luigi Jail iPhone
belmontboy
02-10 03:18 AM
I am assuming here that current employees (both H1B and EADs) are also impacted by this amendment.
Many H1B's currently employed by TARP recepients own a house. This amendment would seriously undermine their financial stability, worst case another foreclosure.
Why would throwing out an immigrant out of his house solve this problem?
Its lame to think that such an amendment would solve foreclosure issues. All it would do is feed more to the fire!
BTW, what do you plan to do with our responses??
Many H1B's currently employed by TARP recepients own a house. This amendment would seriously undermine their financial stability, worst case another foreclosure.
Why would throwing out an immigrant out of his house solve this problem?
Its lame to think that such an amendment would solve foreclosure issues. All it would do is feed more to the fire!
BTW, what do you plan to do with our responses??
wallpaper Mario and Luigi Bowser#39;s
plreddy
08-06 10:33 AM
SRC 07-265 Not approved.
__________________
EB2-I; PD March 2006; I-140 Approved June 2006
I-485 RD July 3; ND Sept 5
__________________
EB2-I; PD March 2006; I-140 Approved June 2006
I-485 RD July 3; ND Sept 5
field
06-17 02:46 AM
have you tried asking them why it is taking long? that's two years time wasted.. :(
2011 Screenshots 3D Luigi Flag
vikki76
11-11 04:47 PM
I am based in Santa Clara, CA.
PD November 2004
EB2
Country: India
I would be interested in joining northern chapter of bay area
PD November 2004
EB2
Country: India
I would be interested in joining northern chapter of bay area
more...
GCBy3000
10-14 08:19 PM
This is insane and selfish attitude.
1. IV core team and all its ACTIVE members are working on common goal which could be seen in the IV homepage.
2. Everybody needs to work as a team and contribute towards the common goal. I dont think IV needs members who can contribute once the bill is passed.
3. If somebody can guarantee these kind of things, then I dont think we need an IV team and 6000+ members.
Contribute if you feel that IV can do its best to get any bills to push through the congress to get some relief ot immigrant community. At least you should be happy that there is one organisation for people like us to voice our issues in the capitol hill. You and I even with million dollars could not get it heard if you dont have strong people force backing.
Have faith. This is not the principle for this issue only. For all the decisions you take in your life.
But at least a promise that a 99% likelihood this bill would be given attention before end of the year.
1. IV core team and all its ACTIVE members are working on common goal which could be seen in the IV homepage.
2. Everybody needs to work as a team and contribute towards the common goal. I dont think IV needs members who can contribute once the bill is passed.
3. If somebody can guarantee these kind of things, then I dont think we need an IV team and 6000+ members.
Contribute if you feel that IV can do its best to get any bills to push through the congress to get some relief ot immigrant community. At least you should be happy that there is one organisation for people like us to voice our issues in the capitol hill. You and I even with million dollars could not get it heard if you dont have strong people force backing.
Have faith. This is not the principle for this issue only. For all the decisions you take in your life.
But at least a promise that a 99% likelihood this bill would be given attention before end of the year.
pappu
04-15 12:28 PM
Clarification on this would help.
2. Some of the biggest law firms will have hundreds of clients who are member of IV. Assuming the worst case scenario, they will be hit with hundreds of emails and it may not give a good impression. Does IV has a plan to contact some of the biggies directly and if so, it would be good if IV provided a list of the same here so that duplication doesnt occur. << Please do understand that this is a worst case scenario and I'm prepared for folks jumping on me and providing examples of various efforts where hardly a few did something without recognizing the worst case scenario part - but thats a risk I'm fine with :-) >>
Let different people contact one lawyer multiple times. I do not see it a problem.
2. Some of the biggest law firms will have hundreds of clients who are member of IV. Assuming the worst case scenario, they will be hit with hundreds of emails and it may not give a good impression. Does IV has a plan to contact some of the biggies directly and if so, it would be good if IV provided a list of the same here so that duplication doesnt occur. << Please do understand that this is a worst case scenario and I'm prepared for folks jumping on me and providing examples of various efforts where hardly a few did something without recognizing the worst case scenario part - but thats a risk I'm fine with :-) >>
Let different people contact one lawyer multiple times. I do not see it a problem.
more...
nb_des
06-06 04:57 PM
Dan,
I am no expert but I believe you got this query because you did not include reference letters along with your labor application. For example if the job requires 2 years of of java experience then you need to include letters proving that you have worked in java for 2 years and thus you are the suitable person for the position.
Hi friends,
I got a letter from BEC stating that I need to prove that I possess some skills for my Labour to be approved. The skills are Java, JSP and Servlet.
I am a Masters' degree holder from US and a Sun Certified Java Programmer.
I did courses during my MS related to Java, JSP and Servlet.
I am really perplexed why the DOL is asking me to prove my Java skills!!!
Will they accept my certification and course work syllabus? If not, how can I prove that.
It is really dissapointing since I have been waiting for Labour for 4+ years. It was filed under EB3.
Thanks for you helps in advance.
Dan19.
I am no expert but I believe you got this query because you did not include reference letters along with your labor application. For example if the job requires 2 years of of java experience then you need to include letters proving that you have worked in java for 2 years and thus you are the suitable person for the position.
Hi friends,
I got a letter from BEC stating that I need to prove that I possess some skills for my Labour to be approved. The skills are Java, JSP and Servlet.
I am a Masters' degree holder from US and a Sun Certified Java Programmer.
I did courses during my MS related to Java, JSP and Servlet.
I am really perplexed why the DOL is asking me to prove my Java skills!!!
Will they accept my certification and course work syllabus? If not, how can I prove that.
It is really dissapointing since I have been waiting for Labour for 4+ years. It was filed under EB3.
Thanks for you helps in advance.
Dan19.
2010 Screenshots 3D Luigi Flag
srkamath
07-15 09:33 PM
how can you count on that? The whole reason we are trying to do visa recapture is because USCIS has in the past (in fact most of the years) wasted visas.
what is the pressure? this year is special as they have also received a very large number of other petitions too (family based, naturalization etc). In fact the big pressure is naturalization because delay there is potentially going to prevent people from voting in the national elections. EB is slightly below the radar.
So I think there is no harm in sending, like they say, a "polite reminder" to USCIS.
agree.
ok, i agree, count me in on this letter effort ..
what is the pressure? this year is special as they have also received a very large number of other petitions too (family based, naturalization etc). In fact the big pressure is naturalization because delay there is potentially going to prevent people from voting in the national elections. EB is slightly below the radar.
So I think there is no harm in sending, like they say, a "polite reminder" to USCIS.
agree.
ok, i agree, count me in on this letter effort ..
more...
samshah
07-14 09:20 PM
Dear friends,
Lets start a rally in Houston similar to that in Sam Jose to raise our voice against the July Visa Bulletin.We appreciate all your ideas.
Lets start a rally in Houston similar to that in Sam Jose to raise our voice against the July Visa Bulletin.We appreciate all your ideas.
hair Renders Mario amp; Sonic at the
cbpds
02-18 06:21 PM
I'm sorry for the confusion, guess things have changed now, can I do the same for my mom as she was here for more than 6 months ?
Man it's very easy. Why pay $275 to CPA when you can do it yourself for less than $20 through Turbo tax or HR Block? In fact I think you probably will not even pay that because you won't be e-filing.
ITIN is just filling out a W7 form and collecting accompanying documentation.
In Turbo tax or HR Block, when you fill out information for your return online, just save as pdf instead of e-filing, print it out and mail it to the Austin, TX address along with W7 and the accompanying documentation.
Man it's very easy. Why pay $275 to CPA when you can do it yourself for less than $20 through Turbo tax or HR Block? In fact I think you probably will not even pay that because you won't be e-filing.
ITIN is just filling out a W7 form and collecting accompanying documentation.
In Turbo tax or HR Block, when you fill out information for your return online, just save as pdf instead of e-filing, print it out and mail it to the Austin, TX address along with W7 and the accompanying documentation.
more...
drirshad
08-13 11:13 PM
Did u make any contributions to IV, its time u do so .....
hot luigi. Type : Cartoon
pappu
12-04 02:16 PM
To properly comment on such questions, one must see all the RFE and denial letter details and the documents you submitted.. Without that it is impossible to get the complete picture and where things went wrong. So I will just answer based on little details I read in the post. This is not a legal advice and I am not an expert. Use it at your own risk.
- First. When you get an RFE for ability to pay, you must always make sure you have a good attorney who can spend lot of time preparing your RFE and is an expert in these matters. Then, if a CPA's help is needed, your employer must get help from a CPA.
- File an appeal. The decision of this appeal will take more than a year. So you can use this pending application as a basis to get your H1B extended.
- If your employer wants to employ you permanently, he can file another GC application and start from scratch.
- First. When you get an RFE for ability to pay, you must always make sure you have a good attorney who can spend lot of time preparing your RFE and is an expert in these matters. Then, if a CPA's help is needed, your employer must get help from a CPA.
- File an appeal. The decision of this appeal will take more than a year. So you can use this pending application as a basis to get your H1B extended.
- If your employer wants to employ you permanently, he can file another GC application and start from scratch.
more...
house Luigi+colani+wallpaper
bigboy007
06-30 12:36 PM
Quick question guys : where are u sending these i mean the Nebraska service center address has PO box where might not deliver what other address for courier u r using ?
tattoo MORE Wallpaper
computer_gig21
09-09 09:35 AM
http://www.travel.state.gov/pdf/EmploymentDemandUsedForCutOffDates.pdf
more...
pictures 3D Luigi Live wallpaper
ritu_raj
10-22 10:09 AM
It's on Saturday Oct 27th, not on Friday.
dresses His name is Chunky Kong,
irock
06-01 07:14 PM
I already filed my i-485. I still support this.
more...
makeup Mario And Luigi Wallpaper
enthu999
10-13 10:29 PM
Thanks for your help enthu999.
The lawyer had sent letter on 10/8 (with old i 140, new i 140 with old PD and I 485 receipt) and have opened SR on 10/7....do you think i should do anything more.
Thanks again.
No problem. Based on the other cases and my own experience the best way to make interfiling and porting of old priority date is when filing the EB2 I-140. In cases where
the intefiling request was made after the EB2 approval it is taking a bit of time. From what I read it would take about 30 -45 days to complete the interfiling/porting request. If you have already opened an SR. In my opinion waiting for an SR response or waiting about 30 days would be the best. Approaching congressmen etc should be last resort thing..in any case the response for their query wouldn't be that fast. Also, congress will heck busy with
their re-elections..best thing is to wait for 30 days from the date you sent the interfiling request and take an Infopass or talk to CSR level 2 office . Good Luck!
The lawyer had sent letter on 10/8 (with old i 140, new i 140 with old PD and I 485 receipt) and have opened SR on 10/7....do you think i should do anything more.
Thanks again.
No problem. Based on the other cases and my own experience the best way to make interfiling and porting of old priority date is when filing the EB2 I-140. In cases where
the intefiling request was made after the EB2 approval it is taking a bit of time. From what I read it would take about 30 -45 days to complete the interfiling/porting request. If you have already opened an SR. In my opinion waiting for an SR response or waiting about 30 days would be the best. Approaching congressmen etc should be last resort thing..in any case the response for their query wouldn't be that fast. Also, congress will heck busy with
their re-elections..best thing is to wait for 30 days from the date you sent the interfiling request and take an Infopass or talk to CSR level 2 office . Good Luck!
girlfriend Wallpaper Astek Luigi Colani
Angry White Male
02-02 11:06 PM
I like your predictive question :D :D American goods? Have you seen those trash cars? Ludicrously expensive and little value. Given the life style, 80% of the folks in this country would not be able afford anything if that happens. Express pathway to 3rd world.
Does express pathway to 3rd world include Indians using fake resumes to get jobs?
Did I tell you that the Internet was invented by Americans are not by Indians?
Indians are idiots who cannot use computers (did the writer of the software for this discussion forum come from India? I didn't think so.)
Does express pathway to 3rd world include Indians using fake resumes to get jobs?
Did I tell you that the Internet was invented by Americans are not by Indians?
Indians are idiots who cannot use computers (did the writer of the software for this discussion forum come from India? I didn't think so.)
hairstyles quot;Carsquot; desktop wallpaper
software7
05-27 09:45 AM
THis excerpt is from Murthy.com website under rumours section.
Rumor : If a foreign national is working on an H-1 or L-1, but travels abroad and enters on the Advance Parole (AP), s/he has lost the H-1 or L-1 status, as well as all the privileges of that status. Such a person would have to use an Employment Authorization Document (EAD) in order to work after returning on AP.
Clarification : The law in this area is rather complex, and somewhat contradictory. If a person enters the U.S. on Advance Parole, s/he no longer holds H-1 or L-1 status. However, under Legacy INS memos and USCIS interpretations, if the foreign national enters on AP, and works without an EAD, it is not regarded as unauthorized employment, if the H-1 or L-1 authorization for employment would not have expired, had the individual not traveled on AP. Additionally, if the individual returns to work for the H-1/L-1 employer after AP travel, s/he can resume the H-1/L-1 status if the employer files a request for extension of that status. The approval of the extension will terminate the grant of parole and return the foreign national to the nonimmigrant status.
Because the ability to work after AP travel is based on memos, rather than law or regulation, and because of the language used in the memos, it is safer for a person who has entered on AP to obtain the EAD, in order to have a clearly valid authorization for employment. For more on this topic, see our March 21, 2008 MurthyBulletin article, Effect of Travel while in H-1/L-1 Status and Pending I-485.
Effect of Travel While in H1B / L-1 Status and Pending I-485
Posted Mar 21, 2008
�MurthyDotCom
There are questions commonly on the minds of many Murthy Law Firm clients, as well as the greater immigrant community, that involve the effect of reentry into the U.S. on those who hold H1B or L-1 status as well as having approved Advance Parole (AP) based upon pending applications to adjust status (I-485). The law pertaining to this situation is not clear and the result is confusion. Thus, many with both H1B (or L-1) status and AP find themselves faced with the difficult decision of how to reenter the U.S. after travel abroad. One must decide between reentering in H1B (or L-1) status, which requires that the passport have a valid H1B (or L-1) visa stamp or utilizing the AP document. AP does not require an approved visa at the U.S. consulate. Such individuals are concerned about the manner they choose for reentering, as this may affect their respective status in the U.S. Answers to many of these questions are in our MurthyBulletin article
Rumor : If a foreign national is working on an H-1 or L-1, but travels abroad and enters on the Advance Parole (AP), s/he has lost the H-1 or L-1 status, as well as all the privileges of that status. Such a person would have to use an Employment Authorization Document (EAD) in order to work after returning on AP.
Clarification : The law in this area is rather complex, and somewhat contradictory. If a person enters the U.S. on Advance Parole, s/he no longer holds H-1 or L-1 status. However, under Legacy INS memos and USCIS interpretations, if the foreign national enters on AP, and works without an EAD, it is not regarded as unauthorized employment, if the H-1 or L-1 authorization for employment would not have expired, had the individual not traveled on AP. Additionally, if the individual returns to work for the H-1/L-1 employer after AP travel, s/he can resume the H-1/L-1 status if the employer files a request for extension of that status. The approval of the extension will terminate the grant of parole and return the foreign national to the nonimmigrant status.
Because the ability to work after AP travel is based on memos, rather than law or regulation, and because of the language used in the memos, it is safer for a person who has entered on AP to obtain the EAD, in order to have a clearly valid authorization for employment. For more on this topic, see our March 21, 2008 MurthyBulletin article, Effect of Travel while in H-1/L-1 Status and Pending I-485.
Effect of Travel While in H1B / L-1 Status and Pending I-485
Posted Mar 21, 2008
�MurthyDotCom
There are questions commonly on the minds of many Murthy Law Firm clients, as well as the greater immigrant community, that involve the effect of reentry into the U.S. on those who hold H1B or L-1 status as well as having approved Advance Parole (AP) based upon pending applications to adjust status (I-485). The law pertaining to this situation is not clear and the result is confusion. Thus, many with both H1B (or L-1) status and AP find themselves faced with the difficult decision of how to reenter the U.S. after travel abroad. One must decide between reentering in H1B (or L-1) status, which requires that the passport have a valid H1B (or L-1) visa stamp or utilizing the AP document. AP does not require an approved visa at the U.S. consulate. Such individuals are concerned about the manner they choose for reentering, as this may affect their respective status in the U.S. Answers to many of these questions are in our MurthyBulletin article
bobzibub
08-22 12:01 PM
EB1,EB2,EBposthumus
:D
:D
rsayed
09-04 09:59 AM
I applied for EAD on June 16th 2008 using paper filing to TSC.
I received EAD today Sep 2nd 2008.
Current EAD was set to expire on 10/4/2008
USCIS gave me a 2 year EAD.
But EAD starts on 9/1/2008 (expires in 2010)
Which means they ate up 1 month and 2-3 days.
Calling USCIS does not help.
They simply say that you have to file EAD again if you want a correction.
The issue is, I am not going to do that for a simple measly 1 month loss.
Above is for your information.
If you have any suggestions, you are most welcome.
Update: You think all these REDs interest me?
Looks like the 90% of people are here not to contribute or talk, but have lot of time, instead of coding or doing QA for their companies.
Anyways, the idea of creating a post was too give information and create a sensible discussion.
One single thread is not going to add up a lot in this database full of too many redundant threads.
The best way to avoid this is to use an approval system for creating threads.
Anyways I dont think this site is useful for a lot of intelligent end users.
Its best for newbies.
Adios Amigos.
Have fun, 2011 is what you all are looking at.
And while you are at it, can you give me some more reds.
I like red.
This seems to be the norm - I got a 2 year EAD too and lost one month. I would suggest a 'DO NOTHING' approach. Knowing USCIS and it's workings, it's best to go with what we got, (until we get our GCs', that is).
I am releived I got a 2-yr EAD.
Btw - Does your card say 'No fingerprint available'? I wonder what that means - I got my fingerprinting done last year (Oct) - so, I don't understand the reason.
I received EAD today Sep 2nd 2008.
Current EAD was set to expire on 10/4/2008
USCIS gave me a 2 year EAD.
But EAD starts on 9/1/2008 (expires in 2010)
Which means they ate up 1 month and 2-3 days.
Calling USCIS does not help.
They simply say that you have to file EAD again if you want a correction.
The issue is, I am not going to do that for a simple measly 1 month loss.
Above is for your information.
If you have any suggestions, you are most welcome.
Update: You think all these REDs interest me?
Looks like the 90% of people are here not to contribute or talk, but have lot of time, instead of coding or doing QA for their companies.
Anyways, the idea of creating a post was too give information and create a sensible discussion.
One single thread is not going to add up a lot in this database full of too many redundant threads.
The best way to avoid this is to use an approval system for creating threads.
Anyways I dont think this site is useful for a lot of intelligent end users.
Its best for newbies.
Adios Amigos.
Have fun, 2011 is what you all are looking at.
And while you are at it, can you give me some more reds.
I like red.
This seems to be the norm - I got a 2 year EAD too and lost one month. I would suggest a 'DO NOTHING' approach. Knowing USCIS and it's workings, it's best to go with what we got, (until we get our GCs', that is).
I am releived I got a 2-yr EAD.
Btw - Does your card say 'No fingerprint available'? I wonder what that means - I got my fingerprinting done last year (Oct) - so, I don't understand the reason.
0 comments:
Post a Comment