funny pictures of dogs with captions
images hairstyles very funny dogs and
axp817
03-29 09:32 AM
- All copies of AP
- EAD
- Passport, of course
- H-1B 797, if valid and if you wish to try entering on H1B
- 485 receipt notice (Good to carry)
- 140 approval notice (Good to carry)
- Labor approval notice (Good to carry)
- Company identification card/badge (Good to carry)
- Current employment verification letter (Good to carry, I never did and I was okay)
- Old stamped APs, if you have used AP to travel in the past (Good to carry)
It is highly unlikely that you will be asked to show any of the 'Good to carry' documents, I never was, but since there isn't a lot of extra 'good to carry' documents, I usually prefer to have all the listed ones with me.
- EAD
- Passport, of course
- H-1B 797, if valid and if you wish to try entering on H1B
- 485 receipt notice (Good to carry)
- 140 approval notice (Good to carry)
- Labor approval notice (Good to carry)
- Company identification card/badge (Good to carry)
- Current employment verification letter (Good to carry, I never did and I was okay)
- Old stamped APs, if you have used AP to travel in the past (Good to carry)
It is highly unlikely that you will be asked to show any of the 'Good to carry' documents, I never was, but since there isn't a lot of extra 'good to carry' documents, I usually prefer to have all the listed ones with me.
wallpaper Most Captions Funny Dog
jayus2k
10-03 02:37 PM
To correct the situation.
-> i had to get a new passport from the Indian Embassy in washington DC
-> The old passport was returned back to me with "Cancelled" stamped on it
-> The visa in the old passport was still valid ( I travelled with it, and I did not have any problems reentering.
My passport was also in jeans and the visa was in a decent situation, so I think your's might be in a similar condition.
I wish i hadn't laundered my passport, but stuff happens, and from experience, i can say that it is not as bad as it seems.
--Hope this helps.
Jay
-> i had to get a new passport from the Indian Embassy in washington DC
-> The old passport was returned back to me with "Cancelled" stamped on it
-> The visa in the old passport was still valid ( I travelled with it, and I did not have any problems reentering.
My passport was also in jeans and the visa was in a decent situation, so I think your's might be in a similar condition.
I wish i hadn't laundered my passport, but stuff happens, and from experience, i can say that it is not as bad as it seems.
--Hope this helps.
Jay
bijurk
04-14 11:26 AM
It was her husband's wish that her daughter study in US.
Although she would love to follow his wishes, she does not want to do anything illegal and wants to return only if everything is valid.
I am sure everyone understand her position given all that she has had to go through.
Her kid is a citizen.
I will follow your advice on contacting the renowned immigration attorney on her behalf.
Although she would love to follow his wishes, she does not want to do anything illegal and wants to return only if everything is valid.
I am sure everyone understand her position given all that she has had to go through.
Her kid is a citizen.
I will follow your advice on contacting the renowned immigration attorney on her behalf.
2011 funny cats and dogs with captions. The captions are meant to be
reddymjm
04-21 01:56 PM
TSC is retrogressed on these two..
more...
Sreeshankar
05-20 11:43 PM
Hi Folks,
(1) Is there a certain number of years for which an advanced parole given by the USCIS? Or, does it depend on what the applicant is writing, for ex, "I am planning a trip to XXX in between July 1, 2009 through 30 December 2010," and the parole is given on that many years of request?
(2) Also, once an advanced parole expires, should the applicant re-apply it continuosly until he/she receives his/her green card? In case of renewal, should the applicant apply for renewal before a certain number of months before the AP expires.
Thanks for answering, friends. This process is so confusing.
Advance Parole(AP) is usually given for one year, usually multiple entries. However some travel permits are given for two years based on special circumstances/requests. If one intends to travel outside US, then AP is necessary, in the absence of other re-entry allowing visas like H1 etc. Usually people apply 2 - 3 months before the expiry of the current AP. Please check the current USCIS regulations by going to the AP section at USCIS site and also consult your lawyer. Thanks.
(1) Is there a certain number of years for which an advanced parole given by the USCIS? Or, does it depend on what the applicant is writing, for ex, "I am planning a trip to XXX in between July 1, 2009 through 30 December 2010," and the parole is given on that many years of request?
(2) Also, once an advanced parole expires, should the applicant re-apply it continuosly until he/she receives his/her green card? In case of renewal, should the applicant apply for renewal before a certain number of months before the AP expires.
Thanks for answering, friends. This process is so confusing.
Advance Parole(AP) is usually given for one year, usually multiple entries. However some travel permits are given for two years based on special circumstances/requests. If one intends to travel outside US, then AP is necessary, in the absence of other re-entry allowing visas like H1 etc. Usually people apply 2 - 3 months before the expiry of the current AP. Please check the current USCIS regulations by going to the AP section at USCIS site and also consult your lawyer. Thanks.
a_paradkar
07-25 02:46 PM
I am assuming when they say through Aug 17 in Q5 & Q6 they mean July 2 to Aug 17?
Can anybody confirm that?
Can anybody confirm that?
more...
pani_6
02-23 05:25 PM
When the illegals are getting credit for staying illegal and use those years towards citizenship. its only fair that we get the same or better deal..Time and Tide waits for no man...we make hay while sun shines... and this is the time to talk about this...
I think this should a one line in the managers amendment...this one is important as this one give meaning to out wait, and some sort of compenstation if not monetory!.
I think this should a one line in the managers amendment...this one is important as this one give meaning to out wait, and some sort of compenstation if not monetory!.
2010 funny dogs and cats with
kartikiran
05-26 09:47 AM
desi_voice, thanks for your encouraging words. I definitely need it...
You give lot of hope for many GC aspirants. Being in US on H1b for 11 years and with the same company is a great thing.
The whole rule of H1B to GC based on employment sucks. Lot of energy is wasted waiting for GC and it drains you mentally. I know lot of people who got GC within 3/4/5 years have moved on to good job position or started some venture on their own apart from buying house and wife going for work, which is great path to settle down.
You give lot of hope for many GC aspirants. Being in US on H1b for 11 years and with the same company is a great thing.
The whole rule of H1B to GC based on employment sucks. Lot of energy is wasted waiting for GC and it drains you mentally. I know lot of people who got GC within 3/4/5 years have moved on to good job position or started some venture on their own apart from buying house and wife going for work, which is great path to settle down.
more...
karthik204
05-31 11:59 AM
The United States Senate agreed to proceed with debate on S. 1348, the comprehensive immigration reform package introduced on May 21 by Senators Edward Kennedy (D-MA) and Jon Kyl (R-AZ). The bill proposes substantial changes to both the immigrant and nonimmigrant visa systems, as well as an overhaul of the employment eligibility verification and worksite enforcement program. Principal proposals include:
� The replacement of the employment-based immigrant visa program and part of the family migration program with a new points-based merit system.
� An initial increase in immigrant visa numbers, which is intended to reduce the lengthy backlogs that have developed in the green card queue. This increase would primarily benefit the family immigration backlog, but is also intended to reduce the employment-based backlog.
� The elimination of several preference categories for foreign nationals seeking to immigrate on the basis of a family relationship and an eventual, and substantial, reduction in the family-based immigrant quota.
� An increase in the annual cap for H-1B workers, together with more stringent eligibility requirements and employer obligations pertaining to the H-1B program, as well as a substantially increased H-1B training and education fee.
� An overhaul of the temporary worker program.
� Introduction of a wide-ranging electronic employment eligibility system, as well as more stringent worksite compliance requirements.
� A new Z nonimmigrant category that would allow undocumented immigrants to regularize their U.S. immigration status and eventually apply for permanent residence.
� Introduction of "trigger" provisions, which would require border security and enforcement improvements to be implemented before many of the substantive provisions of the legislation could take effect.
Numerous amendments to the bill have been introduced in the last several days, some of which have been passed and incorporated into the legislation and others of which remain pending. The Senate has recessed for the Memorial Day holiday week, and no further votes on amendments will take place in the short term, but it should be noted that the text of the bill remains fluid, with additional changes possible in the coming weeks. This alert summarizes the most important employment-related components of the bill.
Creation of a Merit-Based Immigration System
Perhaps the most sweeping change proposed by S. 1348 is the replacement of the current employment-based immigrant system with a points-based merit system. Our present system is based largely on employers' sponsorship of foreign nationals and is primarily keyed to job offers from U.S. employers, preceded by tests of the labor market to determine whether qualified U.S. workers are available to fill open positions. The Senate bill would eliminate the employer sponsorship and labor certification requirements, and would instead allocate immigrant visas on the basis of a foreign national's score on a points assessment that measures applicants against several criteria, including educational background, age, occupation, family ties to a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident, and knowledge of the English language and U.S. civics. Applicants would not be required to have a job offer from a U.S. employer; rather, a job offer would be reduced to one factor among many on the points assessment. The merit system as initially proposed does not contain provisions to recognize some of the most highly sought-after foreign nationals, including individuals of extraordinary ability, outstanding professors and researchers and multinational managers and executives, though a recently proposed amendment to the bill, discussed below, would establish immigrant categories for these types of workers.
Reorganization of the Family-Based Immigration System
The Senate bill proposes dramatic changes to the family-based immigration system. S. 1348 would in the short term increase the visa quota for family immigration in order to reduce existing backlogs (discussed below), but would also reorganize the family preference categories, sharply reducing the types of family members eligible for sponsorship. Spouses and children of U.S. citizens would continue to be recognized as immediate relatives, and would continue to be able to immigrate without the need to wait for the availability of an immigrant visa. However, a large portion of the current family system would be displaced by the merit system discussed above. The Senate bill would reduce the family preference categories to two: (1) a new category for parents of U.S. citizens (who would no longer be recognized as immediate relatives); and (2) the existing preference category for spouses and children of lawful permanent residents and U.S. noncitizen nationals. The existing preference categories for children age 21 and older and for siblings would be eliminated. Instead, ineligible family members would be subject to the merit-based system, which would recognize family ties to U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents as one factor in a larger evaluation of applicants' attributes.
Reallocation of Immigrant Visa Numbers
Immigrant visa quotas would be substantially realigned under S. 1348. Our current law provides for a baseline annual quota of 140,000 immigrant visas for foreign nationals immigrating on the basis of employment. In the past several years, a backlog has developed in several employment-based immigrant categories, with multiyear waits for some prospective immigrant workers. The Senate bill would, in the first five years after enactment, increase the quota for merit-based and employment-based cases, in part to address existing backlogs. An estimated 247,000 numbers would be available for work-related immigration. Beginning in the sixth fiscal year after enactment, however, the quota would drop to 140,000 numbers per year. This level would remain in place for at least two years, until approximately the eighth year after enactment, when the quota would rise to a baseline of 380,000 per year, with additional numbers made available for previously undocumented immigrants who become eligible to apply for permanent residence.
The bill would also realign quotas for family-sponsored immigrants. Visa quotas for family-based immigration are currently set at a baseline of 480,000 per year and are subject to very lengthy backlogs, ranging from five to upwards of 20 years for some family categories. The Senate bill would initially increase visa numbers by more than 100,000 per year in order to reduce the family backlog; however, after the conclusion of backlog reduction efforts, the family-based quota would fall to 127,000 per year.
Changes to the H-1B Program
S. 1348 would make significant changes to the H-1B category, providing some increases to the annual cap, but imposing more stringent eligibility requirements and heavier compliance obligations on employers. Proposed changes include:
� Cap increases. The bill proposes to increase the H-1B cap to an annual baseline of 115,000 numbers per year. The bill would also introduce market-based increases to the cap, known as market escalators, which would provide for additional cap numbers in a given fiscal year based on demand, up to a maximum total of 180,000 numbers per year. For example, if the H-1B cap were reached in the first half of a given fiscal year, the cap would increase for the remainder of the year by 15% of the baseline quota and would be similarly increased by 15% for the following fiscal year. Slightly different formulas would apply if the cap were reached in the latter half of a fiscal year. The bill would also restore the 6,800 cap numbers that are currently set aside for Singaporean and Chilean professionals in the H-1B1 category.
� Elimination of ability to qualify on the basis of experience. The bill would require an H-1B worker to possess a bachelor's degree in the specialty in which he or she will work, eliminating the ability of a foreign national to qualify on the basis of experience in lieu of a degree.
� H-1B fee increase to $5,000. An amendment to the bill proposes to increase the H-1B education and training fee from the current level of $1,500 to $5,000.
� The replacement of the employment-based immigrant visa program and part of the family migration program with a new points-based merit system.
� An initial increase in immigrant visa numbers, which is intended to reduce the lengthy backlogs that have developed in the green card queue. This increase would primarily benefit the family immigration backlog, but is also intended to reduce the employment-based backlog.
� The elimination of several preference categories for foreign nationals seeking to immigrate on the basis of a family relationship and an eventual, and substantial, reduction in the family-based immigrant quota.
� An increase in the annual cap for H-1B workers, together with more stringent eligibility requirements and employer obligations pertaining to the H-1B program, as well as a substantially increased H-1B training and education fee.
� An overhaul of the temporary worker program.
� Introduction of a wide-ranging electronic employment eligibility system, as well as more stringent worksite compliance requirements.
� A new Z nonimmigrant category that would allow undocumented immigrants to regularize their U.S. immigration status and eventually apply for permanent residence.
� Introduction of "trigger" provisions, which would require border security and enforcement improvements to be implemented before many of the substantive provisions of the legislation could take effect.
Numerous amendments to the bill have been introduced in the last several days, some of which have been passed and incorporated into the legislation and others of which remain pending. The Senate has recessed for the Memorial Day holiday week, and no further votes on amendments will take place in the short term, but it should be noted that the text of the bill remains fluid, with additional changes possible in the coming weeks. This alert summarizes the most important employment-related components of the bill.
Creation of a Merit-Based Immigration System
Perhaps the most sweeping change proposed by S. 1348 is the replacement of the current employment-based immigrant system with a points-based merit system. Our present system is based largely on employers' sponsorship of foreign nationals and is primarily keyed to job offers from U.S. employers, preceded by tests of the labor market to determine whether qualified U.S. workers are available to fill open positions. The Senate bill would eliminate the employer sponsorship and labor certification requirements, and would instead allocate immigrant visas on the basis of a foreign national's score on a points assessment that measures applicants against several criteria, including educational background, age, occupation, family ties to a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident, and knowledge of the English language and U.S. civics. Applicants would not be required to have a job offer from a U.S. employer; rather, a job offer would be reduced to one factor among many on the points assessment. The merit system as initially proposed does not contain provisions to recognize some of the most highly sought-after foreign nationals, including individuals of extraordinary ability, outstanding professors and researchers and multinational managers and executives, though a recently proposed amendment to the bill, discussed below, would establish immigrant categories for these types of workers.
Reorganization of the Family-Based Immigration System
The Senate bill proposes dramatic changes to the family-based immigration system. S. 1348 would in the short term increase the visa quota for family immigration in order to reduce existing backlogs (discussed below), but would also reorganize the family preference categories, sharply reducing the types of family members eligible for sponsorship. Spouses and children of U.S. citizens would continue to be recognized as immediate relatives, and would continue to be able to immigrate without the need to wait for the availability of an immigrant visa. However, a large portion of the current family system would be displaced by the merit system discussed above. The Senate bill would reduce the family preference categories to two: (1) a new category for parents of U.S. citizens (who would no longer be recognized as immediate relatives); and (2) the existing preference category for spouses and children of lawful permanent residents and U.S. noncitizen nationals. The existing preference categories for children age 21 and older and for siblings would be eliminated. Instead, ineligible family members would be subject to the merit-based system, which would recognize family ties to U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents as one factor in a larger evaluation of applicants' attributes.
Reallocation of Immigrant Visa Numbers
Immigrant visa quotas would be substantially realigned under S. 1348. Our current law provides for a baseline annual quota of 140,000 immigrant visas for foreign nationals immigrating on the basis of employment. In the past several years, a backlog has developed in several employment-based immigrant categories, with multiyear waits for some prospective immigrant workers. The Senate bill would, in the first five years after enactment, increase the quota for merit-based and employment-based cases, in part to address existing backlogs. An estimated 247,000 numbers would be available for work-related immigration. Beginning in the sixth fiscal year after enactment, however, the quota would drop to 140,000 numbers per year. This level would remain in place for at least two years, until approximately the eighth year after enactment, when the quota would rise to a baseline of 380,000 per year, with additional numbers made available for previously undocumented immigrants who become eligible to apply for permanent residence.
The bill would also realign quotas for family-sponsored immigrants. Visa quotas for family-based immigration are currently set at a baseline of 480,000 per year and are subject to very lengthy backlogs, ranging from five to upwards of 20 years for some family categories. The Senate bill would initially increase visa numbers by more than 100,000 per year in order to reduce the family backlog; however, after the conclusion of backlog reduction efforts, the family-based quota would fall to 127,000 per year.
Changes to the H-1B Program
S. 1348 would make significant changes to the H-1B category, providing some increases to the annual cap, but imposing more stringent eligibility requirements and heavier compliance obligations on employers. Proposed changes include:
� Cap increases. The bill proposes to increase the H-1B cap to an annual baseline of 115,000 numbers per year. The bill would also introduce market-based increases to the cap, known as market escalators, which would provide for additional cap numbers in a given fiscal year based on demand, up to a maximum total of 180,000 numbers per year. For example, if the H-1B cap were reached in the first half of a given fiscal year, the cap would increase for the remainder of the year by 15% of the baseline quota and would be similarly increased by 15% for the following fiscal year. Slightly different formulas would apply if the cap were reached in the latter half of a fiscal year. The bill would also restore the 6,800 cap numbers that are currently set aside for Singaporean and Chilean professionals in the H-1B1 category.
� Elimination of ability to qualify on the basis of experience. The bill would require an H-1B worker to possess a bachelor's degree in the specialty in which he or she will work, eliminating the ability of a foreign national to qualify on the basis of experience in lieu of a degree.
� H-1B fee increase to $5,000. An amendment to the bill proposes to increase the H-1B education and training fee from the current level of $1,500 to $5,000.
hair funny cats and dogs with captions. funny pictures of cats with
lalithkx
07-24 03:51 PM
I think they are processing concurrent I-140's and I-485's but only for people whose PD is current. I have seen lot of approvals for EB2 folks both for I140's and I485's here on IV and on . I guess only us EB-3 folks are not getting processed ( maybe some EB2 also ). But mostly its EB-3 which are in cold storage.:(
Right now looks like they are concentration on EB2(ROW) approvals as much as possible. Since next month EB2 India and China is going to advance, they wan to make sure as many approvable EB2(ROW) as possible are approved. EB2 India can look forward for lot of approvals in August and Sep.
Right now looks like they are concentration on EB2(ROW) approvals as much as possible. Since next month EB2 India and China is going to advance, they wan to make sure as many approvable EB2(ROW) as possible are approved. EB2 India can look forward for lot of approvals in August and Sep.
more...
amoljak
03-22 12:53 PM
Here is a history of 5th/14th amendment cases related to immigrants:
http://www.cis.org/articles/2005/back305.html
(Although this is from an anti immigrant viewpoint, we can ignore the author's views and use the facts he is upset about)
http://www.cis.org/articles/2005/back305.html
(Although this is from an anti immigrant viewpoint, we can ignore the author's views and use the facts he is upset about)
hot Category: Funny dog pictures
lazycis
12-07 08:40 AM
AC21 is fairly simple. The legal framework is one paragraph in the INA (8 U.S.C. 1154(j)):
(j) Job flexibility for long delayed applicants for adjustment of status to permanent residence
A petition under subsection (a)(1)(D) of this section for an individual whose application for adjustment of status pursuant to section 1255 of this title has been filed and remained unadjudicated for 180 days or more shall remain valid with respect to a new job if the individual changes jobs or employers if the new job is in the same or a similar occupational classification as the job for which the petition was filed.
That's it. The INS/USCIS has never implemented regulations to work out the details. So as long as your new job is "in the same or a similar occupational classification as the job for which the petition was filed" (petition is your I-140), you are fine. No need to worry about job location, salary or filing new G-28 form or even notifying the USCIS about the new job as it is NOT required by law.
Department of Labor has a database of occupational codes.
http://www.bls.gov/soc/soc_majo.htm
Check it and just make sure your new job falls under the same category. I firmly believe that as long as the job falls under the same high-level group, there is no need to worry. Even if it does not, there is a good chance the USCIS will never ask you about a job change.
The most important part is to make sure the old employer won't withdraw your I-140.
Keep in mind that I am not a lawyer so take my advice with a grain of salt.
(j) Job flexibility for long delayed applicants for adjustment of status to permanent residence
A petition under subsection (a)(1)(D) of this section for an individual whose application for adjustment of status pursuant to section 1255 of this title has been filed and remained unadjudicated for 180 days or more shall remain valid with respect to a new job if the individual changes jobs or employers if the new job is in the same or a similar occupational classification as the job for which the petition was filed.
That's it. The INS/USCIS has never implemented regulations to work out the details. So as long as your new job is "in the same or a similar occupational classification as the job for which the petition was filed" (petition is your I-140), you are fine. No need to worry about job location, salary or filing new G-28 form or even notifying the USCIS about the new job as it is NOT required by law.
Department of Labor has a database of occupational codes.
http://www.bls.gov/soc/soc_majo.htm
Check it and just make sure your new job falls under the same category. I firmly believe that as long as the job falls under the same high-level group, there is no need to worry. Even if it does not, there is a good chance the USCIS will never ask you about a job change.
The most important part is to make sure the old employer won't withdraw your I-140.
Keep in mind that I am not a lawyer so take my advice with a grain of salt.
more...
house girlfriend Funny Dog Pictures
akred
02-28 12:02 AM
1. File for an extension so you can file your return by Oct 15.
2. Go to the local IRS office with your wife and papers and submit the application for the ITIN.
3. Once the ITIN arrives in the mail, figure out which way gets you the most refund - married filing jointly or married filing separately.
4. File the one return or file two returns one for you and one for the wife.
All the forms are available from irs.gov in fillable form. If you use a calculator, no need to use Turbotax or whatever. BTW, IRS auditors here are friendlier than IRS at home :-).
2. Go to the local IRS office with your wife and papers and submit the application for the ITIN.
3. Once the ITIN arrives in the mail, figure out which way gets you the most refund - married filing jointly or married filing separately.
4. File the one return or file two returns one for you and one for the wife.
All the forms are available from irs.gov in fillable form. If you use a calculator, no need to use Turbotax or whatever. BTW, IRS auditors here are friendlier than IRS at home :-).
tattoo funny cats and dogs with captions. Posted in Funny Cats amp; Dogs,
greencard_seeker
08-06 12:18 PM
did anyone received receipts yet??
more...
pictures dresses funny dogs and
desi3933
06-10 01:51 PM
desi3933 ,
India and China got more visas in a given year that was because of Spill Over from other categories. That has nothing to do with waste of visas. If they didnot have waste visas India / China could have got more visas.
I see your point. However, spillover is not defined exactly for allocation. So, there is no legal basis for asking for those visas.
There is one more thing I would like to add here. Using the strict interpretation, the law states visa numbers not exceeding <visa limit>. This makes issuing less number of visas legal. (Please feel free to get this confirmed with a lawyer).
Unfortunately, law is not emotions based. One has to show damages, that is defined in legal terms, for any lawsuit.
In my personal opinion, only congress can pass law, so as to authorize Department od State to release any additional visa numbers from previous years. This may involve lot of lobbying.
_____________________
Not a legal advice.
India and China got more visas in a given year that was because of Spill Over from other categories. That has nothing to do with waste of visas. If they didnot have waste visas India / China could have got more visas.
I see your point. However, spillover is not defined exactly for allocation. So, there is no legal basis for asking for those visas.
There is one more thing I would like to add here. Using the strict interpretation, the law states visa numbers not exceeding <visa limit>. This makes issuing less number of visas legal. (Please feel free to get this confirmed with a lawyer).
Unfortunately, law is not emotions based. One has to show damages, that is defined in legal terms, for any lawsuit.
In my personal opinion, only congress can pass law, so as to authorize Department od State to release any additional visa numbers from previous years. This may involve lot of lobbying.
_____________________
Not a legal advice.
dresses hot funny dogs and cats with
shantanup
08-06 11:20 AM
Src-07-278-5****
Not approved yet
Not approved yet
more...
makeup Funny Dogs with Captions-
kosu
04-21 03:36 PM
When does the processing time come into picture. Is it this month or from May 01st.
girlfriend Funny Dogs And Cats With Captions. funny pictures of dogs with
needhelp!
04-16 06:09 PM
I want to send this information to my Lawyer. To get her interested I want to know how many active members do we have in IV?
33K members
33K members
hairstyles funny dogs and cats with
gc_kaavaali
09-08 03:34 PM
today My AP renewal application had status change. Status has below details; Does it means it is approved?
Current Status: Document mailed to applicant.
On September 8, 2008 we mailed the document to the address we have on file. You should receive the new document within 30 days. If you do not, or if you move before you get it, call customer service.
Current Status: Document mailed to applicant.
On September 8, 2008 we mailed the document to the address we have on file. You should receive the new document within 30 days. If you do not, or if you move before you get it, call customer service.
lazycis
08-15 10:23 AM
I should thank everyone who replied to my post. All your replies are giving me some hope here. Thanks for all your support.
Check this thread for basic name check info.
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=11087
Your husband's GC is not in danger.
Check this thread for basic name check info.
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=11087
Your husband's GC is not in danger.
samrat_bhargava_vihari
02-08 10:03 AM
munna_bhai, this is like telling the whole ramayan and in the end you are asking who is sita?
So where is ramayana.. ( i mean suitable situation) i want to read..
So where is ramayana.. ( i mean suitable situation) i want to read..
0 comments:
Post a Comment